Descripción
The dataset comprises presence data of arthropods, but also on the groups 'Annelida', 'Bacillariophyta', 'Ascomycota', 'Basidiomycota', 'Bryozoa', 'Chordata', 'Cnidaria', 'Echinodermata', 'Glomeromycota', 'Haptophyta', 'Mollusca', 'Mucoromycota', 'Nematoda', 'Nemertea', 'Ochrophyta', 'Oomycota', 'Porifera', 'Pseudomonadota', 'Rhodophyta', 'Rotifera' and 'Tardigrada'. The arthropods were collected in four different life stages of short rotation coppices (harvested, young (2 years), mature (3 years) and old (4 years)) using 3 different trapping techniques: branch sampling (BS), coloured canopy Malaise traps (MT) and pitfall traps (PIT). In each life stage, three sets of traps were placed (3 sites per life stage) and activated for two weeks, each in May, June, July and August. Once in a month, a branch sampling was conducted. In the branch sampling, 16 trees within a radius of 20m around the canopy Malaise traps were randomly selected and shaken for 10 s. Arthropods fell on a plastic tarpaulin of 1x1 m that was emptied into a collection bottle where the arthropods were stored in 96.7% ethanol.
The samples were analysed using DNA metabarcoding. In DNA metabarcoding, the Cytochrome Oxidase I-Region was targeted using the primers fwhF2 (forward) and fwhR2n (reverse) from Vamos et al 2017 (https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.1.14625) The sequences found in the samples were matched with sequences in the BOLD database. The sequences displayed are already grouped like it is known from OTUs. For this grouping, all sequences with a similarity of 97% were compiled, which means that the grouped sequences finally comprise different genetic variants of the same taxa. For each hit in the database, a plausibility check was performed by comparing the distribution range of a species (calculated from GBIF coordinates) and the trapping locations. For each detection of a sequence in a sample, the number of reads is also given. A flagging system helps the user to estimate the degree of uncertainty arising from each species hit.
This data and the data in the datasets "https://doi.org/10.15468/9pzhm6" and "https://doi.org/10.15468/9pzhm6" belongs to one study.
Registros
Los datos en este recurso de evento de muestreo han sido publicados como Archivo Darwin Core(DwC-A), el cual es un formato estándar para compartir datos de biodiversidad como un conjunto de una o más tablas de datos. La tabla de datos del core contiene 141 registros.
también existen 2 tablas de datos de extensiones. Un registro en una extensión provee información adicional sobre un registro en el core. El número de registros en cada tabla de datos de la extensión se ilustra a continuación.
Este IPT archiva los datos y, por lo tanto, sirve como repositorio de datos. Los datos y los metadatos del recurso están disponibles para su descarga en la sección descargas. La tabla versiones enumera otras versiones del recurso que se han puesto a disposición del público y permite seguir los cambios realizados en el recurso a lo largo del tiempo.
Versiones
La siguiente tabla muestra sólo las versiones publicadas del recurso que son de acceso público.
Derechos
Los usuarios deben respetar los siguientes derechos de uso:
El publicador y propietario de los derechos de este trabajo es Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB). Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons de Atribución/Reconocimiento (CC-BY 4.0).
Registro GBIF
Este recurso ha sido registrado en GBIF con el siguiente UUID: 3fe20fcc-d684-44e6-823a-9121d06be1ac. Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB) publica este recurso y está registrado en GBIF como un publicador de datos avalado por GBIF Germany.
Palabras clave
Samplingevent; Specimen
Datos externos
Los datos del recurso también están disponibles en otros formatos
| ASV-Registry | https://doi.org/10.20363/6wdc-yh16 UTF-8 Microsoft Excel |
|---|
Contactos
- Originador ●
- Punto De Contacto
- Usuario
- Usuario
Cobertura geográfica
Near the town Reipoltskirchen, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| Coordenadas límite | Latitud Mínima Longitud Mínima [-90, -180], Latitud Máxima Longitud Máxima [90, 180] |
|---|
Cobertura taxonómica
No hay descripción disponible
| Reino | Animalia |
|---|---|
| Orden | Symphypleona, Heteronemertea, Mermithida, Hemiptera, Sarcoptiformes, Opiliones, Philodinida, Sordariales, Pucciniales, Glomerellalles, Tubulaniformes, Polydesmida, Monostilifera, Enchytraeida, Adinetida, Onygenales, Siphonaptera, Ceramiales, Julida, Plectida, Raphidioptera, Blattodea, Microascales, Ixodida, Crassiclitellata, Glomerida, Thysanoptera, Neuroptera, Dermaptera, Parachaela, Anthoathecata, Erysiphales, Ephemeroptera, Araneae, Helotiales, Mucorales, Agaricales, Mesostigmata, Plecoptera, Chordeumatida, Triganglionata, Lepidoptera, Ostropales, Pleosporales, Diptera, Teloschistales, Entomobryomorpha, Glomerellales, Trichoptera, Arthoniales, Geophilomorpha, Polyporales, Neelipleona, Anura, Sporidiobolales, Lithobiomorpha, Eurotiales, Mycocaliciales, Orthoptera, Rhabditida, Lecanorales, Russulales, Hypocreales, Coleoptera, Chaetothyriales, Peltigerales, Mecoptera, Hymenoptera, Thelephorales, Boletales, Peronosporales, Psocodea, Cantharellales, Trombidiformes, Clupeiformes, Stylommatophora, Cystobasidiales, Poduromorpha, Dothideales, Isopoda |
Cobertura temporal
| Fecha Inicial / Fecha Final | 2022-05-10 / 2022-08-26 |
|---|
Datos del proyecto
The dataset comprises presence data of arthropods, but also on the groups 'Annelida', 'Bacillariophyta', 'Ascomycota', 'Basidiomycota', 'Bryozoa', 'Chordata', 'Cnidaria', 'Echinodermata', 'Glomeromycota', 'Haptophyta', 'Mollusca', 'Mucoromycota', 'Nematoda', 'Nemertea', 'Ochrophyta', 'Oomycota', 'Porifera', 'Pseudomonadota', 'Rhodophyta', 'Rotifera' and 'Tardigrada'.
| Título | DNA metabarcoding data of arthropods collected in different life stages of short rotation coppices (SRC) |
|---|---|
| Identificador | P142690-DNA-MB_2025 |
| Fuentes de Financiación | Heinrich Böll foundation (P142690) and Trier University of Applied Sciences: Junior Researcher Fund |
Métodos de muestreo
The arthropods were collected in four different life stages of short rotation coppices (harvested, young (2 years), mature (3 years) and old (4 years)) using 3 different trapping techniques: branch sampling (BS), coloured canopy Malaise traps (MT) and pitfall traps (PIT). In each life stage, three sets of traps were placed (3 sites per life stage) and activated for two weeks, each in May, June, July and August. Once in a month, a branch sampling was conducted. In the branch sampling, 16 trees within a radius of 20m around the canopy Malaise traps were randomly selected and shaken for 10 s. Arthropods fell on a plastic tarpaulin of 1x1 m that was emptied into a collection bottle where the arthropods were stored in 96.7% ethanol.
| Área de Estudio | The dataset comprises presence data of arthropods, but also on the groups 'Annelida', 'Bacillariophyta', 'Ascomycota', 'Basidiomycota', 'Bryozoa', 'Chordata', 'Cnidaria', 'Echinodermata', 'Glomeromycota', 'Haptophyta', 'Mollusca', 'Mucoromycota', 'Nematoda', 'Nemertea', 'Ochrophyta', 'Oomycota', 'Porifera', 'Pseudomonadota', 'Rhodophyta', 'Rotifera' and 'Tardigrada'. |
|---|
Descripción de la metodología paso a paso:
- The samples were analysed using DNA metabarcoding. In DNA metabarcoding, the Cytochrome Oxidase I-Region was targeted using the primers fwhF2 (forward) and fwhR2n (reverse) from Vamos et al 2017 (https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.1.14625) The sequences found in the samples were matched with sequences in the BOLD database. The sequences displayed are already grouped like it is known from OTUs. For this grouping, all sequences with a similarity of 97% were compiled, which means that the grouped sequences finally comprise different genetic variants of the same taxa. For each hit in the database, a plausibility check was performed by comparing the distribution range of a species (calculated from GBIF coordinates) and the trapping locations. For each detection of a sequence in a sample, the number of reads is also given. A flagging system helps the user to estimate the degree of uncertainty arising from each species hit.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Hoffmann L, Stoll S, Rach B (2026). Butterfly abundance data of four different short rotation coppice (SRC) life stages. Version 1.2. Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB). Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/9pzhm6 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-01-30. https://doi.org/10.15468/9pzhm6
- Hoffmann L, Stoll S, Huber J, Rach B (2026). Vegetation data of four different short rotation coppice (SRC) life stages. Version 1.6. Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB). Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/phmw92 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-01-30. https://doi.org/10.15468/phmw92
Metadatos adicionales
| Identificadores alternativos | 3fe20fcc-d684-44e6-823a-9121d06be1ac |
|---|---|
| https://biocase.zfmk.de/ipt/resource?r=dna_metabarcoding_data_of_arthropods_src |